iis – How to deploy an ASP.NET Application with zero downtime

The Question :

127 people think this question is useful

To deploy a new version of our website we do the following:

  1. Zip up the new code, and upload it to the server.
  2. On the live server, delete all the live code from the IIS website directory.
  3. Extract the new code zipfile into the now empty IIS directory

This process is all scripted, and happens quite quickly, but there can still be a 10-20 second downtime when the old files are being deleted, and the new files being deployed.

Any suggestions on a 0 second downtime method?

The Question Comments :
  • Shouldn’t this be on ServerFault?
  • Perhaps, but ServerFault didn’t exist in Sep ’08
  • Can IIS point to a symlink folder? Will changing the symlink cause IIS process to recycle?
  • any final solution with full source code script sample?
  • Isn’t it possible to have multiple app pools and switch the traffic from one app pool to another?

The Answer 1

79 people think this answer is useful

You need 2 servers and a load balancer. Here’s in steps:

  1. Turn all traffic on Server 2
  2. Deploy on Server 1
  3. Test Server 1
  4. Turn all traffic on Server 1
  5. Deploy on Server 2
  6. Test Server 2
  7. Turn traffic on both servers

Thing is, even in this case you will still have application restarts and loss of sessions if you are using “sticky sessions”. If you have database sessions or a state server, then everything should be fine.

The Answer 2

60 people think this answer is useful

The Microsoft Web Deployment Tool supports this to some degree:

Enables Windows Transactional File System (TxF) support. When TxF support is enabled, file operations are atomic; that is, they either succeed or fail completely. This ensures data integrity and prevents data or files from existing in a “half-way” or corrupted state. In MS Deploy, TxF is disabled by default.

It seems the transaction is for the entire sync. Also, TxF is a feature of Windows Server 2008, so this transaction feature will not work with earlier versions.

I believe it’s possible to modify your script for 0-downtime using folders as versions and the IIS metabase:

  • for an existing path/url:
  • Copy new (or modified) website to server under
    • \web\app\v2.1\
  • Modify IIS metabase to change the website path
    • from \web\app\2.0\
    • to \web\app\v2.1\

This method offers the following benefits:

  • In the event new version has a problem, you can easily rollback to v2.0
  • To deploy to multiple physical or virtual servers, you could use your script for file deployment. Once all servers have the new version, you can simultaneously change all servers’ metabases using the Microsoft Web Deployment Tool.

The Answer 3

12 people think this answer is useful

You can achieve zero downtime deployment on a single server by utilizing Application Request Routing in IIS as a software load balancer between two local IIS sites on different ports. This is known as a blue green deployment strategy where only one of the two sites is available in the load balancer at any given time. Deploy to the site that is “down”, warm it up, and bring it into the load balancer (usually by passing a Application Request Routing health check), then take the original site that was up, out of the “pool” (again by making its health check fail).

A full tutorial can be found here.

The Answer 4

7 people think this answer is useful

I went through this recently and the solution I came up with was to have two sites set up in IIS and to switch between them.

For my configuration, I had a web directory for each A and B site like this: c:\Intranet\Live A\Interface c:\Intranet\Live B\Interface

In IIS, I have two identical sites (same ports, authentication etc) each with their own application pool. One of the sites is running (A) and the other is stopped (B). the live one also has the live host header.

When it comes to deploy to live, I simply publish to the STOPPED site’s location. Because I can access the B site using its port, I can pre-warm the site so the first user doesn’t cause an application start. Then using a batch file I copy the live host header to B, stop A and start B.

The Answer 5

7 people think this answer is useful

Using Microsoft.Web.Administration’s ServerManager class you can develop your own deployment agent.

The trick is to change the PhysicalPath of the VirtualDirectory, which results in an online atomic switch between old and new web apps.

Be aware that this can result in old and new AppDomains executing in parallel!

The problem is how to synchronize changes to databases etc.

By polling for the existence of AppDomains with old or new PhysicalPaths it is possible to detect when the old AppDomain(s) have terminated, and if the new AppDomain(s) have started up.

To force an AppDomain to start you must make an HTTP request (IIS 7.5 supports Autostart feature)

Now you need a way to block requests for the new AppDomain. I use a named mutex – which is created and owned by the deployment agent, waited on by the Application_Start of the new web app, and then released by the deployment agent once the database updates have been made.

(I use a marker file in the web app to enable the mutex wait behaviour) Once the new web app is running I delete the marker file.

The Answer 6

7 people think this answer is useful

OK so since everyone is downvoting the answer I wrote way back in 2008*…

I will tell you how we do it now in 2014. We no longer use Web Sites because we are using ASP.NET MVC now.

We certainly do not need a load balancer and two servers to do it, that’s fine if you have 3 servers for every website you maintain but it’s total overkill for most websites.

Also, we don’t rely on the latest wizard from Microsoft – too slow, and too much hidden magic, and too prone to changing its name.

Here’s how we do it:

  1. We have a post build step that copies generated DLLs into a ‘bin-pub’ folder.

  2. We use Beyond Compare (which is excellent**) to verify and sync changed files (over FTP because that is widely supported) up to the production server

  3. We have a secure URL on the website containing a button which copies everything in ‘bin-pub’ to ‘bin’ (taking a backup first to enable quick rollback). At this point the app restarts itself. Then our ORM checks if there are any tables or columns that need to be added and creates them.

That is only milliseconds downtime. The app restart can take a second or two but during the restart requests are buffered so there is effectively zero downtime.

The whole deployment process takes anywhere from 5 seconds to 30 minutes, depending how many files are changed and how many changes to review.

This way you do not have to copy an entire website to a different directory but just the bin folder. You also have complete control over the process and know exactly what is changing.

**We always do a quick eyeball of the changes we are deploying – as a last minute double check, so we know what to test and if anything breaks we ready. We use Beyond Compare because it lets you easily diff files over FTP. I would never do this without BC, you have no idea what you are overwriting.

*Scroll to the bottom to see it 🙁 BTW I would no longer recommend Web Sites because they are slower to build and can crash badly with half compiled temp files. We used them in the past because they allowed more agile file-by-file deployment. Very quick to fix a minor issue and you can see exactly what you are deploying (if using Beyond Compare of course – otherwise forget it).

The Answer 7

5 people think this answer is useful

The only zero downtime methods I can think of involve hosting on at least 2 servers.

The Answer 8

1 people think this answer is useful

I would refine George’s answer a bit, as follows, for a single server:

  1. Use a Web Deployment Project to pre-compile the site into a single DLL
  2. Zip up the new site, and upload it to the server
  3. Unzip it to a new folder located in a folder with the right permissions for the site, so the unzipped files inherit the permissions correctly (perhaps e:\web, with subfolders v20090901, v20090916, etc)
  4. Use IIS Manager to change the name of folder containing the site
  5. Keep the old folder around for a while, so you can fallback to it in the event of problems

Step 4 will cause the IIS worker process to recycle.

This is only zero downtime if you’re not using InProc sessions; use SQL mode instead if you can (even better, avoid session state entirely).

Of course, it’s a little more involved when there are multiple servers and/or database changes….

The Answer 9

1 people think this answer is useful

To expand on sklivvz’s answer, which relied on having some kind of load balancer (or just a standby copy on the same server)

  1. Direct all traffic to Site/Server 2
  2. Optionally wait a bit, to ensure that as few users as possible have pending workflows on the deployed version
  3. Deploy to Site/Server 1 and warm it up as much as possible
  4. Execute database migrations transactionally (strive to make this possible)
  5. Immediately direct all traffic to Site/Server 1
  6. Deploy to Site/Server 2
  7. Direct traffic to both sites/servers

It is possible to introduce a bit of smoke testing, by creating a database snapshot/copy, but that’s not always feasible.

If possible and needed use “routing differences”, such as different tenant URL:s (customerX.myapp.net) or different users, to deploy to an unknowing group of guinea pigs first. If nothing fails, release to everyone.

Since database migrations are involved, rolling back to a previous version is often impossible.

There are ways to make applications play nicer in these scenarios, such as using event queues and playback mechanisms, but since we’re talking about deploying changes to something that is in use, there’s really no fool proof way.

The Answer 10

1 people think this answer is useful

This is how I do it:

Absolute minimum system requirements:
1 server with

  • 1 load balancer/reverse proxy (e.g. nginx) running on port 80
  • 2 ASP.NET-Core/mono reverse-proxy/fastcgi chroot-jails or docker-containers listening on 2 different TCP ports
    (or even just two reverse-proxy applications on 2 different TCP ports without any sandbox)


start transaction myupdate

    Web-Service: Tell all applications on all web-servers to go into primary read-only mode 
    Application switch to primary read-only mode, and responds 
    Web sockets begin notifying all clients 
    Wait for all applications to respond

    wait (custom short interval)

    Web-Service: Tell all applications on all web-servers to go into secondary read-only mode 
    Application switch to secondary read-only mode (data-entry fuse)
    Updatedb - secondary read-only mode (switches database to read-only)

    Web-Service: Create backup of database 
    Web-Service: Restore backup to new database
    Web-Service: Update new database with new schema 

    Deploy new application to apt-repository 
    (for windows, you will have to write your own custom deployment web-service)
    ssh into every machine in array_of_new_webapps
    run apt-get update
    then either 
    apt-get dist-upgrade
    apt-get install <packagename>
    apt-get install --only-upgrade <packagename>
    depending on what you need
    -- This deploys the new application to all new chroots (or servers/VMs)

    Test: Test new application under test.domain.xxx
    -- everything that fails should throw an exception here
    commit myupdate;

    Web-Service: Tell all applications to send web-socket request to reload the pages to all clients at time x (+/- random number)
    @client: notify of reload and that this causes loss of unsafed data, with option to abort 

    @ time x:  Switch load balancer from array_of_old_webapps to array_of_new_webapps 
    Decomission/Recycle array_of_old_webapps, etc.

        rollback myupdate 
        switch to read-write mode
        Web-Service: Tell all applications to send web-socket request to unblock read-only mode
end try 

The Answer 11

-7 people think this answer is useful

I would suggest keeping the old files there and simply overwriting them. That way the downtime is limited to single-file overwrite times and there is only ever one file missing at a time.

Not sure this helps in a “web application” though (i think you are saying that’s what you’re using), which is why we always use “web sites”. Also with “web sites” deploying doesn’t restart your site and drop all the user sessions.

Add a Comment