## The Question :

*368 people think this question is useful*

What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?

From what I’ve seen, either one can work as a replacement for the other if need be, so should I bother using both or should I stick to just one of them?

Will the style of the program influence my choice? I am doing some machine learning using numpy, so there are indeed lots of matrices, but also lots of vectors (arrays).

*The Question Comments :*

## The Answer 1

*11 people think this answer is useful*

As per the official documents, it’s not anymore advisable to use matrix class since it will be removed in the future.

https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/generated/numpy.matrix.html

As other answers already state that you can achieve all the operations with NumPy arrays.

## The Answer 2

*418 people think this answer is useful*

Numpy **matrices** are strictly 2-dimensional, while numpy **arrays** (ndarrays) are
N-dimensional. Matrix objects are a subclass of ndarray, so they inherit all
the attributes and methods of ndarrays.

The main advantage of numpy matrices is that they provide a convenient notation
for matrix multiplication: if a and b are matrices, then `a*b`

is their matrix
product.

import numpy as np
a = np.mat('4 3; 2 1')
b = np.mat('1 2; 3 4')
print(a)
# [[4 3]
# [2 1]]
print(b)
# [[1 2]
# [3 4]]
print(a*b)
# [[13 20]
# [ 5 8]]

On the other hand, as of Python 3.5, NumPy supports infix matrix multiplication using the `@`

operator, so you can achieve the same convenience of matrix multiplication with ndarrays in Python >= 3.5.

import numpy as np
a = np.array([[4, 3], [2, 1]])
b = np.array([[1, 2], [3, 4]])
print(a@b)
# [[13 20]
# [ 5 8]]

Both matrix objects and ndarrays have `.T`

to return the transpose, but matrix
objects also have `.H`

for the conjugate transpose, and `.I`

for the inverse.

In contrast, numpy arrays consistently abide by the rule that operations are
applied element-wise (except for the new `@`

operator). Thus, if `a`

and `b`

are numpy arrays, then `a*b`

is the array
formed by multiplying the components element-wise:

c = np.array([[4, 3], [2, 1]])
d = np.array([[1, 2], [3, 4]])
print(c*d)
# [[4 6]
# [6 4]]

To obtain the result of matrix multiplication, you use `np.dot`

(or `@`

in Python >= 3.5, as shown above):

print(np.dot(c,d))
# [[13 20]
# [ 5 8]]

The `**`

operator also behaves differently:

print(a**2)
# [[22 15]
# [10 7]]
print(c**2)
# [[16 9]
# [ 4 1]]

Since `a`

is a matrix, `a**2`

returns the matrix product `a*a`

.
Since `c`

is an ndarray, `c**2`

returns an ndarray with each component squared
element-wise.

There are other technical differences between matrix objects and ndarrays
(having to do with `np.ravel`

, item selection and sequence behavior).

**The main advantage of numpy arrays is that they are more general than
2-dimensional matrices**. What happens when you want a 3-dimensional array? Then
you have to use an ndarray, not a matrix object. Thus, learning to use matrix
objects is more work — you have to learn matrix object operations, and
ndarray operations.

Writing a program that mixes both matrices and arrays makes your life difficult
because you have to keep track of what type of object your variables are, lest
multiplication return something you don’t expect.

**In contrast, if you stick solely with ndarrays, then you can do everything
matrix objects can do, and more, except with slightly different
functions/notation.**

If you are willing to give up the visual appeal of NumPy matrix product
notation (which can be achieved almost as elegantly with ndarrays in Python >= 3.5), then I think NumPy arrays are definitely the way to go.

PS. Of course, you really don’t have to choose one at the expense of the other,
since `np.asmatrix`

and `np.asarray`

allow you to convert one to the other (as
long as the array is 2-dimensional).

There is a synopsis of the differences between NumPy `arrays`

vs NumPy `matrix`

es here.

## The Answer 3

*93 people think this answer is useful*

Scipy.org recommends that you use arrays:

***’array’ or ‘matrix’? Which should I use? – Short answer**

Use arrays.

They are the standard vector/matrix/tensor type of numpy. Many numpy function return arrays, not matrices.

There is a clear distinction between element-wise operations and
linear algebra operations.

You can have standard vectors or row/column vectors if you like.

The only disadvantage of using the array type is that you will have to
use `dot`

instead of `*`

to multiply (reduce) two tensors (scalar product,
matrix vector multiplication etc.).

## The Answer 4

*29 people think this answer is useful*

Just to add one case to unutbu’s list.

One of the biggest practical differences for me of numpy ndarrays compared to numpy matrices or matrix languages like matlab, is that the dimension is not preserved in reduce operations. Matrices are always 2d, while the mean of an array, for example, has one dimension less.

For example demean rows of a matrix or array:

with matrix

>>> m = np.mat([[1,2],[2,3]])
>>> m
matrix([[1, 2],
[2, 3]])
>>> mm = m.mean(1)
>>> mm
matrix([[ 1.5],
[ 2.5]])
>>> mm.shape
(2, 1)
>>> m - mm
matrix([[-0.5, 0.5],
[-0.5, 0.5]])

with array

>>> a = np.array([[1,2],[2,3]])
>>> a
array([[1, 2],
[2, 3]])
>>> am = a.mean(1)
>>> am.shape
(2,)
>>> am
array([ 1.5, 2.5])
>>> a - am #wrong
array([[-0.5, -0.5],
[ 0.5, 0.5]])
>>> a - am[:, np.newaxis] #right
array([[-0.5, 0.5],
[-0.5, 0.5]])

I also think that mixing arrays and matrices gives rise to many “happy” debugging hours.
However, scipy.sparse matrices are always matrices in terms of operators like multiplication.

## The Answer 5

*21 people think this answer is useful*

As others have mentioned, perhaps the main advantage of `matrix`

was that it provided a convenient notation for matrix multiplication.

However, in Python 3.5 there is finally a dedicated infix operator for matrix multiplication: `@`

.

With recent NumPy versions, it can be used with `ndarray`

s:

A = numpy.ones((1, 3))
B = numpy.ones((3, 3))
A @ B

So nowadays, even more, when in doubt, you should stick to `ndarray`

.