python – Converting a Pandas GroupBy output from Series to DataFrame

The Question :

532 people think this question is useful

I’m starting with input data like this

df1 = pandas.DataFrame( { 
    "Name" : ["Alice", "Bob", "Mallory", "Mallory", "Bob" , "Mallory"] , 
    "City" : ["Seattle", "Seattle", "Portland", "Seattle", "Seattle", "Portland"] } )

Which when printed appears as this:

   City     Name
0   Seattle    Alice
1   Seattle      Bob
2  Portland  Mallory
3   Seattle  Mallory
4   Seattle      Bob
5  Portland  Mallory

Grouping is simple enough:

g1 = df1.groupby( [ "Name", "City"] ).count()

and printing yields a GroupBy object:

                  City  Name
Name    City
Alice   Seattle      1     1
Bob     Seattle      2     2
Mallory Portland     2     2
        Seattle      1     1

But what I want eventually is another DataFrame object that contains all the rows in the GroupBy object. In other words I want to get the following result:

                  City  Name
Name    City
Alice   Seattle      1     1
Bob     Seattle      2     2
Mallory Portland     2     2
Mallory Seattle      1     1

I can’t quite see how to accomplish this in the pandas documentation. Any hints would be welcome.

The Question Comments :
  • Aside question: which pandas version do you use? If execute first 2 commands I get g1 as Empty DataFrame Columns: [] Index: [(Alice, Seattle), (Bob, Seattle), (Mallory, Portland), (Mallory, Seattle)]
  • The question’s title is misleading with regard to the accepted answer
  • @matanster may I ask what you came here looking to know the answer to? We can think about writing a more accurate answer and directing users’ attention with a comment under the question.
  • @coldspeed This is just a typical issue with SO, question titles are let to diverge significantly from the content of the question and answers. If meta wasn’t as hostile that would probably be a useful aspect to raise there.
  • @matanster I agree, however I was only curious to know what it is you were actually searching the answer for, such that it led you to here.

The Answer 1

574 people think this answer is useful

g1 here is a DataFrame. It has a hierarchical index, though:

In [19]: type(g1)
Out[19]: pandas.core.frame.DataFrame

In [20]: g1.index
Out[20]: 
MultiIndex([('Alice', 'Seattle'), ('Bob', 'Seattle'), ('Mallory', 'Portland'),
       ('Mallory', 'Seattle')], dtype=object)

Perhaps you want something like this?

In [21]: g1.add_suffix('_Count').reset_index()
Out[21]: 
      Name      City  City_Count  Name_Count
0    Alice   Seattle           1           1
1      Bob   Seattle           2           2
2  Mallory  Portland           2           2
3  Mallory   Seattle           1           1

Or something like:

In [36]: DataFrame({'count' : df1.groupby( [ "Name", "City"] ).size()}).reset_index()
Out[36]: 
      Name      City  count
0    Alice   Seattle      1
1      Bob   Seattle      2
2  Mallory  Portland      2
3  Mallory   Seattle      1

The Answer 2

138 people think this answer is useful

I want to slightly change the answer given by Wes, because version 0.16.2 requires as_index=False. If you don’t set it, you get an empty dataframe.

Source:

Aggregation functions will not return the groups that you are aggregating over if they are named columns, when as_index=True, the default. The grouped columns will be the indices of the returned object.

Passing as_index=False will return the groups that you are aggregating over, if they are named columns.

Aggregating functions are ones that reduce the dimension of the returned objects, for example: mean, sum, size, count, std, var, sem, describe, first, last, nth, min, max. This is what happens when you do for example DataFrame.sum() and get back a Series.

nth can act as a reducer or a filter, see here.

import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({"Name":["Alice", "Bob", "Mallory", "Mallory", "Bob" , "Mallory"],
                    "City":["Seattle","Seattle","Portland","Seattle","Seattle","Portland"]})
print df1
#
#       City     Name
#0   Seattle    Alice
#1   Seattle      Bob
#2  Portland  Mallory
#3   Seattle  Mallory
#4   Seattle      Bob
#5  Portland  Mallory
#
g1 = df1.groupby(["Name", "City"], as_index=False).count()
print g1
#
#                  City  Name
#Name    City
#Alice   Seattle      1     1
#Bob     Seattle      2     2
#Mallory Portland     2     2
#        Seattle      1     1
#

EDIT:

In version 0.17.1 and later you can use subset in count and reset_index with parameter name in size:

print df1.groupby(["Name", "City"], as_index=False ).count()
#IndexError: list index out of range

print df1.groupby(["Name", "City"]).count()
#Empty DataFrame
#Columns: []
#Index: [(Alice, Seattle), (Bob, Seattle), (Mallory, Portland), (Mallory, Seattle)]

print df1.groupby(["Name", "City"])[['Name','City']].count()
#                  Name  City
#Name    City                
#Alice   Seattle      1     1
#Bob     Seattle      2     2
#Mallory Portland     2     2
#        Seattle      1     1

print df1.groupby(["Name", "City"]).size().reset_index(name='count')
#      Name      City  count
#0    Alice   Seattle      1
#1      Bob   Seattle      2
#2  Mallory  Portland      2
#3  Mallory   Seattle      1

The difference between count and size is that size counts NaN values while count does not.

The Answer 3

23 people think this answer is useful

Simply, this should do the task:

import pandas as pd

grouped_df = df1.groupby( [ "Name", "City"] )

pd.DataFrame(grouped_df.size().reset_index(name = "Group_Count"))

Here, grouped_df.size() pulls up the unique groupby count, and reset_index() method resets the name of the column you want it to be. Finally, the pandas Dataframe() function is called upon to create a DataFrame object.

The Answer 4

22 people think this answer is useful

The key is to use the reset_index() method.

Use:

import pandas

df1 = pandas.DataFrame( { 
    "Name" : ["Alice", "Bob", "Mallory", "Mallory", "Bob" , "Mallory"] , 
    "City" : ["Seattle", "Seattle", "Portland", "Seattle", "Seattle", "Portland"] } )

g1 = df1.groupby( [ "Name", "City"] ).count().reset_index()

Now you have your new dataframe in g1:

result dataframe

The Answer 5

10 people think this answer is useful

Maybe I misunderstand the question but if you want to convert the groupby back to a dataframe you can use .to_frame(). I wanted to reset the index when I did this so I included that part as well.

example code unrelated to question

df = df['TIME'].groupby(df['Name']).min()
df = df.to_frame()
df = df.reset_index(level=['Name',"TIME"])

The Answer 6

6 people think this answer is useful

I found this worked for me.

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

df1 = pd.DataFrame({ 
    "Name" : ["Alice", "Bob", "Mallory", "Mallory", "Bob" , "Mallory"] , 
    "City" : ["Seattle", "Seattle", "Portland", "Seattle", "Seattle", "Portland"]})

df1['City_count'] = 1
df1['Name_count'] = 1

df1.groupby(['Name', 'City'], as_index=False).count()

The Answer 7

6 people think this answer is useful

Below solution may be simpler:

df1.reset_index().groupby( [ "Name", "City"],as_index=False ).count()

The Answer 8

4 people think this answer is useful

I have aggregated with Qty wise data and store to dataframe

almo_grp_data = pd.DataFrame({'Qty_cnt' :
almo_slt_models_data.groupby( ['orderDate','Item','State Abv']
          )['Qty'].sum()}).reset_index()

The Answer 9

3 people think this answer is useful

These solutions only partially worked for me because I was doing multiple aggregations. Here is a sample output of my grouped by that I wanted to convert to a dataframe:

Groupby Output

Because I wanted more than the count provided by reset_index(), I wrote a manual method for converting the image above into a dataframe. I understand this is not the most pythonic/pandas way of doing this as it is quite verbose and explicit, but it was all I needed. Basically, use the reset_index() method explained above to start a “scaffolding” dataframe, then loop through the group pairings in the grouped dataframe, retrieve the indices, perform your calculations against the ungrouped dataframe, and set the value in your new aggregated dataframe.

df_grouped = df[['Salary Basis', 'Job Title', 'Hourly Rate', 'Male Count', 'Female Count']]
df_grouped = df_grouped.groupby(['Salary Basis', 'Job Title'], as_index=False)

# Grouped gives us the indices we want for each grouping
# We cannot convert a groupedby object back to a dataframe, so we need to do it manually
# Create a new dataframe to work against
df_aggregated = df_grouped.size().to_frame('Total Count').reset_index()
df_aggregated['Male Count'] = 0
df_aggregated['Female Count'] = 0
df_aggregated['Job Rate'] = 0

def manualAggregations(indices_array):
    temp_df = df.iloc[indices_array]
    return {
        'Male Count': temp_df['Male Count'].sum(),
        'Female Count': temp_df['Female Count'].sum(),
        'Job Rate': temp_df['Hourly Rate'].max()
    }

for name, group in df_grouped:
    ix = df_grouped.indices[name]
    calcDict = manualAggregations(ix)

    for key in calcDict:
        #Salary Basis, Job Title
        columns = list(name)
        df_aggregated.loc[(df_aggregated['Salary Basis'] == columns[0]) & 
                          (df_aggregated['Job Title'] == columns[1]), key] = calcDict[key]

If a dictionary isn’t your thing, the calculations could be applied inline in the for loop:

    df_aggregated['Male Count'].loc[(df_aggregated['Salary Basis'] == columns[0]) & 
                                (df_aggregated['Job Title'] == columns[1])] = df['Male Count'].iloc[ix].sum()

Add a Comment