I have an integer and a list. I would like to make a new list of them beginning with the variable and ending with the list.
Writing a + list
I get errors. The compiler handles a
as integer, thus I cannot use append, or extend either.
How would you do this?
Append integer to beginning of list in Python
The Question :
The Answer 1
>>>var=7 >>>array = [1,2,3,4,5,6] >>>array.insert(0,var) >>>array [7, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
How it works:
array.insert(index, value)
Insert an item at a given position. The first argument is the index of the element before which to insert, so array.insert(0, x)
inserts at the front of the list, and array.insert(len(array), x)
is equivalent to array.append(x)
.Negative values are treated as being relative to the end of the array.
The Answer 2
>>> a = 5 >>> li = [1, 2, 3] >>> [a] + li # Don't use 'list' as variable name. [5, 1, 2, 3]
The Answer 3
Note that if you are trying to do that operation often, especially in loops, a list is the wrong data structure.
Lists are not optimized for modifications at the front, and somelist.insert(0, something)
is an O(n) operation.
somelist.pop(0)
and del somelist[0]
are also O(n) operations.
The correct data structure to use is a deque
from the collections
module. deques expose an interface that is similar to those of lists, but are optimized for modifications from both endpoints. They have an appendleft
method for insertions at the front.
Demo:
In [1]: lst = [0]*1000 In [2]: timeit -n1000 lst.insert(0, 1) 1000 loops, best of 3: 794 ns per loop In [3]: from collections import deque In [4]: deq = deque([0]*1000) In [5]: timeit -n1000 deq.appendleft(1) 1000 loops, best of 3: 73 ns per loop
The Answer 4
Another way of doing the same,
list[0:0] = [a]
The Answer 5
You can use Unpack list:
a = 5
li = [1,2,3]
li = [a, *li]
=> [5, 1, 2, 3]
The Answer 6
Based on some (minimal) benchmarks using the timeit
module it seems that the following has similar if not better performance than the accepted answer
new_lst = [a, *lst]
As with [a] + list
this will create a new list and not mutate lst
.
If your intention is to mutate the list then use lst.insert(0, a)
.
The Answer 7
Alternative:
>>> from collections import deque >>> my_list = deque() >>> my_list.append(1) # append right >>> my_list.append(2) # append right >>> my_list.append(3) # append right >>> my_list.appendleft(100) # append left >>> my_list deque([100, 1, 2, 3]) >>> my_list[0] 100
[NOTE]:
collections.deque
is faster than Python pure list
in a loop Relevant-Post.
The Answer 8
New lists can be made by simply adding lists together.
list1 = ['value1','value2','value3'] list2 = ['value0'] newlist=list2+list1 print(newlist)
The Answer 9
list_1.insert(0,ur_data)
make sure that ur_data is of string type
so if u have data= int(5)
convert it to ur_data = str(data)
The Answer 10
None of these worked for me. I converted the first element to be part of a series (a single element series), and converted the second element also to be a series, and used append function.
l = ((pd.Series(<first element>)).append(pd.Series(<list of other elements>))).tolist()
Related Posts

java – just a quick question regarding two’s complement

CollectionView content under navigation bar
