## The Question :

*596 people think this question is useful*

Let’s say that I have an Javascript array looking as following:

["Element 1","Element 2","Element 3",...]; // with close to a hundred elements.

What approach would be appropriate to chunk (split) the array into many smaller arrays with, lets say, 10 elements at its most?

*The Question Comments :*

## The Answer 1

*735 people think this answer is useful*

The array.slice method can extract a slice from the beginning, middle, or end of an array for whatever purposes you require, without changing the original array.

var i,j,temparray,chunk = 10;
for (i=0,j=array.length; i<j; i+=chunk) {
temparray = array.slice(i,i+chunk);
// do whatever
}

## The Answer 2

*155 people think this answer is useful*

Modified from an answer by dbaseman: https://stackoverflow.com/a/10456344/711085

Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'chunk_inefficient', {
value: function(chunkSize) {
var array = this;
return [].concat.apply([],
array.map(function(elem, i) {
return i % chunkSize ? [] : [array.slice(i, i + chunkSize)];
})
);
}
});
console.log(
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].chunk_inefficient(3)
)
// [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7]]

*minor addendum*:

I should point out that the above is a not-that-elegant (in my mind) workaround to use `Array.map`

. It basically does the following, where ~ is concatenation:

[[1,2,3]]~[]~[]~[] ~ [[4,5,6]]~[]~[]~[] ~ [[7]]

It has the same asymptotic running time as the method below, but perhaps a worse constant factor due to building empty lists. One could rewrite this as follows (mostly the same as Blazemonger’s method, which is why I did not originally submit this answer):

More efficient method:

// refresh page if experimenting and you already defined Array.prototype.chunk
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'chunk', {
value: function(chunkSize) {
var R = [];
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i += chunkSize)
R.push(this.slice(i, i + chunkSize));
return R;
}
});
console.log(
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7].chunk(3)
)

My preferred way nowadays is the above, or one of the following:

Array.range = function(n) {
// Array.range(5) --> [0,1,2,3,4]
return Array.apply(null,Array(n)).map((x,i) => i)
};
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'chunk', {
value: function(n) {
// ACTUAL CODE FOR CHUNKING ARRAY:
return Array.range(Math.ceil(this.length/n)).map((x,i) => this.slice(i*n,i*n+n));
}
});

Demo:

> JSON.stringify( Array.range(10).chunk(3) );
[[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9],[10]]

Or if you don’t want an Array.range function, it’s actually just a one-liner (excluding the fluff):

var ceil = Math.ceil;
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'chunk', {value: function(n) {
return Array(ceil(this.length/n)).fill().map((_,i) => this.slice(i*n,i*n+n));
}});

or

Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'chunk', {value: function(n) {
return Array.from(Array(ceil(this.length/n)), (_,i)=>this.slice(i*n,i*n+n));
}});

## The Answer 3

*131 people think this answer is useful*

Here’s a ES6 version using reduce

var perChunk = 2 // items per chunk
var inputArray = ['a','b','c','d','e']
var result = inputArray.reduce((resultArray, item, index) => {
const chunkIndex = Math.floor(index/perChunk)
if(!resultArray[chunkIndex]) {
resultArray[chunkIndex] = [] // start a new chunk
}
resultArray[chunkIndex].push(item)
return resultArray
}, [])
console.log(result); // result: [['a','b'], ['c','d'], ['e']]

And you’re ready to chain further map/reduce transformations.
Your input array is left intact

If you prefer a shorter but less readable version, you can sprinkle some `concat`

into the mix for the same end result:

inputArray.reduce((all,one,i) => {
const ch = Math.floor(i/perChunk);
all[ch] = [].concat((all[ch]||[]),one);
return all
}, [])

## The Answer 4

*112 people think this answer is useful*

Try to avoid mucking with native prototypes, including Array.prototype, if you don’t know who will be consuming your code (3rd parties, coworkers, yourself at a later date, etc.).

There are ways to safely extend prototypes (but not in all browsers) and there are ways to safely consume objects created from extended prototypes, but a better rule of thumb is to follow the Principle of Least Surprise and avoid these practices altogether.

If you have some time, watch Andrew Dupont’s JSConf 2011 talk, “Everything is Permitted: Extending Built-ins”, for a good discussion about this topic.

But back to the question, while the solutions above will work, they are overly complex and requiring unnecessary computational overhead. Here is my solution:

function chunk (arr, len) {
var chunks = [],
i = 0,
n = arr.length;
while (i < n) {
chunks.push(arr.slice(i, i += len));
}
return chunks;
}
// Optionally, you can do the following to avoid cluttering the global namespace:
Array.chunk = chunk;

## The Answer 5

*64 people think this answer is useful*

I tested the different answers into jsperf.com. The result is available there: https://web.archive.org/web/20150909134228/https://jsperf.com/chunk-mtds

And the fastest function (and that works from IE8) is this one:

function chunk(arr, chunkSize) {
if (chunkSize <= 0) throw "Invalid chunk size";
var R = [];
for (var i=0,len=arr.length; i<len; i+=chunkSize)
R.push(arr.slice(i,i+chunkSize));
return R;
}

## The Answer 6

*43 people think this answer is useful*

One-liner in ECMA 6

const [list,chuckSize] = [[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], 6]
[...Array(Math.ceil(list.length / chuckSize))].map(_ => list.splice(0,chuckSize))

## The Answer 7

*34 people think this answer is useful*

I’d prefer to use splice method:

var chunks = function(array, size) {
var results = [];
while (array.length) {
results.push(array.splice(0, size));
}
return results;
};

## The Answer 8

*33 people think this answer is useful*

Nowadays you can use lodash’ chunk function to split the array into smaller arrays https://lodash.com/docs#chunk No need to fiddle with the loops anymore!

## The Answer 9

*31 people think this answer is useful*

Old question: New answer! I actually was working with an answer from this question and had a friend improve on it! So here it is:

Array.prototype.chunk = function ( n ) {
if ( !this.length ) {
return [];
}
return [ this.slice( 0, n ) ].concat( this.slice(n).chunk(n) );
};
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0].chunk(3);
> [[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9],[0]]

## The Answer 10

*28 people think this answer is useful*

# Using generators

function* chunks(arr, n) {
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i += n) {
yield arr.slice(i, i + n);
}
}
let someArray = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
console.log([...chunks(someArray, 2)]) // [[0,1],[2,3],[4,5],[6,7],[8,9]]

## The Answer 11

*24 people think this answer is useful*

There have been many answers but this is what I use:

const chunk = (arr, size) =>
arr
.reduce((acc, _, i) =>
(i % size)
? acc
: [...acc, arr.slice(i, i + size)]
, [])
// USAGE
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
chunk(numbers, 3)
// [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9], [10]]

First, check for a remainder when dividing the index by the chunk size.

If there is a remainder then just return the accumulator array.

If there is no remainder then the index is divisible by the chunk size, so take a slice from the original array (starting at the current index) and add it to the accumulator array.

So, the returned accumulator array for each iteration of reduce looks something like this:

// 0: [[1, 2, 3]]
// 1: [[1, 2, 3]]
// 2: [[1, 2, 3]]
// 3: [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]
// 4: [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]
// 5: [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]
// 6: [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]]
// 7: [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]]
// 8: [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]]
// 9: [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9], [10]]

## The Answer 12

*18 people think this answer is useful*

I think this a nice recursive solution with ES6 syntax:

const chunk = function(array, size) {
if (!array.length) {
return [];
}
const head = array.slice(0, size);
const tail = array.slice(size);
return [head, ...chunk(tail, size)];
};
console.log(chunk([1,2,3], 2));

## The Answer 13

*16 people think this answer is useful*

Ok, let’s start with a fairly tight one:

function chunk(arr, n) {
return arr.slice(0,(arr.length+n-1)/n|0).
map(function(c,i) { return arr.slice(n*i,n*i+n); });
}

Which is used like this:

chunk([1,2,3,4,5,6,7], 2);

Then we have this tight reducer function:

function chunker(p, c, i) {
(p[i/this|0] = p[i/this|0] || []).push(c);
return p;
}

Which is used like this:

[1,2,3,4,5,6,7].reduce(chunker.bind(3),[]);

Since a kitten dies when we bind `this`

to a number, we can do manual currying like this instead:

// Fluent alternative API without prototype hacks.
function chunker(n) {
return function(p, c, i) {
(p[i/n|0] = p[i/n|0] || []).push(c);
return p;
};
}

Which is used like this:

[1,2,3,4,5,6,7].reduce(chunker(3),[]);

Then the still pretty tight function which does it all in one go:

function chunk(arr, n) {
return arr.reduce(function(p, cur, i) {
(p[i/n|0] = p[i/n|0] || []).push(cur);
return p;
},[]);
}
chunk([1,2,3,4,5,6,7], 3);

## The Answer 14

*16 people think this answer is useful*

One more solution using `Array.prototype.reduce()`

:

const chunk = (array, size) =>
array.reduce((acc, _, i) => {
if (i % size === 0) acc.push(array.slice(i, i + size))
return acc
}, [])
// Usage:
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
const chunked = chunk(numbers, 3)
console.log(chunked)

This solution is very similar to the solution by Steve Holgado. However, because this solution doesn’t utilize array spreading and doesn’t create new arrays in the reducer function, it’s faster (see jsPerf test) and subjectively more readable (simpler syntax) than the other solution.

At every *nth* iteration (where *n* = `size`

; starting at the first iteration), the accumulator array (`acc`

) is appended with a chunk of the array (`array.slice(i, i + size)`

) and then returned. At other iterations, the accumulator array is returned as-is.

If `size`

is zero, the method returns an empty array. If `size`

is negative, the method returns broken results. So, if needed in your case, you may want to do something about negative or non-positive `size`

values.

If speed is important in your case, a simple `for`

loop would be faster than using `reduce()`

(see the jsPerf test), and some may find this style more readable as well:

function chunk(array, size) {
// This prevents infinite loops
if (size < 1) throw new Error('Size must be positive')
const result = []
for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i += size) {
result.push(array.slice(i, i + size))
}
return result
}

## The Answer 15

*14 people think this answer is useful*

I aimed at creating a simple non-mutating solution in pure ES6. Peculiarities in javascript make it necessary to fill the empty array before mapping 🙁

function chunk(a, l) {
return new Array(Math.ceil(a.length / l)).fill(0)
.map((_, n) => a.slice(n*l, n*l + l));
}

This version with recursion seem simpler and more compelling:

function chunk(a, l) {
if (a.length == 0) return [];
else return [a.slice(0, l)].concat(chunk(a.slice(l), l));
}

The ridiculously weak array functions of ES6 makes for good puzzles 🙂

## The Answer 16

*11 people think this answer is useful*

Created a npm package for this https://www.npmjs.com/package/array.chunk

var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i += size) {
result.push(arr.slice(i, size + i));
}
return result;

When using a TypedArray

var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i += size) {
result.push(arr.subarray(i, size + i));
}
return result;

## The Answer 17

*9 people think this answer is useful*

If you use EcmaScript version >= 5.1, you can implement a functional version of `chunk()`

using array.reduce() that has O(N) complexity:

function chunk(chunkSize, array) {
return array.reduce(function(previous, current) {
var chunk;
if (previous.length === 0 ||
previous[previous.length -1].length === chunkSize) {
chunk = []; // 1
previous.push(chunk); // 2
}
else {
chunk = previous[previous.length -1]; // 3
}
chunk.push(current); // 4
return previous; // 5
}, []); // 6
}
console.log(chunk(2, ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']));
// prints [ [ 'a', 'b' ], [ 'c', 'd' ], [ 'e' ] ]

Explanation of each `// nbr`

above:

- Create a new chunk if the previous value, i.e. the previously returned array of chunks, is empty or if the last previous chunk has
`chunkSize`

items
- Add the new chunk to the array of existing chunks
- Otherwise, the current chunk is the last chunk in the array of chunks
- Add the current value to the chunk
- Return the modified array of chunks
- Initialize the reduction by passing an empty array

Currying based on `chunkSize`

:

var chunk3 = function(array) {
return chunk(3, array);
};
console.log(chunk3(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']));
// prints [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c' ], [ 'd', 'e' ] ]

You can add the `chunk()`

function to the global `Array`

object:

Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'chunk', {
value: function(chunkSize) {
return this.reduce(function(previous, current) {
var chunk;
if (previous.length === 0 ||
previous[previous.length -1].length === chunkSize) {
chunk = [];
previous.push(chunk);
}
else {
chunk = previous[previous.length -1];
}
chunk.push(current);
return previous;
}, []);
}
});
console.log(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'].chunk(4));
// prints [ [ 'a', 'b', 'c' 'd' ], [ 'e' ] ]

## The Answer 18

*8 people think this answer is useful*

The following ES2015 approach works without having to define a function and directly on anonymous arrays (example with chunk size 2):

[11,22,33,44,55].map((_, i, all) => all.slice(2*i, 2*i+2)).filter(x=>x.length)

If you want to define a function for this, you could do it as follows (improving on K._’s comment on Blazemonger’s answer):

const array_chunks = (array, chunk_size) => array
.map((_, i, all) => all.slice(i*chunk_size, (i+1)*chunk_size))
.filter(x => x.length)

## The Answer 19

*7 people think this answer is useful*

in coffeescript:
b = (a.splice(0, len) while a.length)
demo
a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
b = (a.splice(0, 2) while a.length)
[ [ 1, 2 ],
[ 3, 4 ],
[ 5, 6 ],
[ 7 ] ]

## The Answer 20

*7 people think this answer is useful*

results = []
chunk_size = 10
while(array.length > 0){
results.push(array.splice(0, chunk_size))
}

## The Answer 21

*7 people think this answer is useful*

Use chunk from lodash

lodash.chunk(arr,<size>).forEach(chunk=>{
console.log(chunk);
})

## The Answer 22

*7 people think this answer is useful*

Using `Array.prototype.splice()`

and splice it until the array has element.

Array.prototype.chunk = function(size) {
let result = [];
while(this.length) {
result.push(this.splice(0, size));
}
return result;
}
const arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];
console.log(arr.chunk(2));

### Update

`Array.prototype.splice()`

populates the original array and after performing the `chunk()`

the original array (`arr`

) becomes `[]`

.

So if you want to keep the original array untouched, then copy and keep the `arr`

data into another array and do the same thing.

Array.prototype.chunk = function(size) {
let data = [...this];
let result = [];
while(data.length) {
result.push(data.splice(0, size));
}
return result;
}
const arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];
console.log('chunked:', arr.chunk(2));
console.log('original', arr);

P.S: Thanks to @mts-knn for mentioning the matter.

## The Answer 23

*6 people think this answer is useful*

And this would be my contribution to this topic. I guess `.reduce()`

is the best way.

var segment = (arr, n) => arr.reduce((r,e,i) => i%n ? (r[r.length-1].push(e), r)
: (r.push([e]), r), []),
arr = Array.from({length: 31}).map((_,i) => i+1);
res = segment(arr,7);
console.log(JSON.stringify(res));

But the above implementation is not very efficient since `.reduce()`

runs through all `arr`

function. A more efficient approach (very close to the fastest imperative solution) would be, iterating over the reduced (to be chunked) array since we can calculate it’s size in advance by `Math.ceil(arr/n);`

. Once we have the empty result array like `Array(Math.ceil(arr.length/n)).fill();`

the rest is to map slices of the `arr`

array into it.

function chunk(arr,n){
var r = Array(Math.ceil(arr.length/n)).fill();
return r.map((e,i) => arr.slice(i*n, i*n+n));
}
arr = Array.from({length: 31},(_,i) => i+1);
res = chunk(arr,7);
console.log(JSON.stringify(res));

## The Answer 24

*5 people think this answer is useful*

For a functional solution, using Ramda:

Where `popularProducts`

is your input array, `5`

is the chunk size

import splitEvery from 'ramda/src/splitEvery'
splitEvery(5, popularProducts).map((chunk, i) => {
// do something with chunk
})

## The Answer 25

*5 people think this answer is useful*

const array = [86,133,87,133,88,133,89,133,90,133];
const new_array = [];
const chunksize = 2;
while (array.length) {
const chunk = array.splice(0,chunksize);
new_array.push(chunk);
}
console.log(new_array)

## The Answer 26

*4 people think this answer is useful*

ES6 one-line approach based on `Array.prototype`

`reduce`

and `push`

methods:

const doChunk = (list, size) => list.reduce((r, v) =>
(!r.length || r[r.length - 1].length === size ?
r.push([v]) : r[r.length - 1].push(v)) && r
, []);
console.log(doChunk([0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], 5));
// [[0, 1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 6, 7, 8, 9], [10, 11, 12]]

## The Answer 27

*4 people think this answer is useful*

ES6 Generator version

function* chunkArray(array,size=1){
var clone = array.slice(0);
while (clone.length>0)
yield clone.splice(0,size);
};
var a = new Array(100).fill().map((x,index)=>index);
for(const c of chunkArray(a,10))
console.log(c);

## The Answer 28

*4 people think this answer is useful*

This is the most efficient and straight-forward solution I could think of:

function chunk(array, chunkSize) {
let chunkCount = Math.ceil(array.length / chunkSize);
let chunks = new Array(chunkCount);
for(let i = 0, j = 0, k = chunkSize; i < chunkCount; ++i) {
chunks[i] = array.slice(j, k);
j = k;
k += chunkSize;
}
return chunks;
}

## The Answer 29

*4 people think this answer is useful*

ES6 spreads functional #ohmy #ftw

const chunk =
(size, xs) =>
xs.reduce(
(segments, _, index) =>
index % size === 0
? [...segments, xs.slice(index, index + size)]
: segments,
[]
);
console.log( chunk(3, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]) );

## The Answer 30

*4 people think this answer is useful*

# Here’s a recursive solution that is tail call optimize.

const splitEvery = (n, xs, y=[]) =>
xs.length===0 ? y : splitEvery(n, xs.slice(n), y.concat([xs.slice(0, n)]))
console.log(splitEvery(2, [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]))